Prediction of Melinda Czink vs Ryoko Fuda Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Czink vs R. Fuda

Melinda Czink
HUN
l
w
w
w
l
w
w
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
43
Age
39
1.78m
Height
1.65m
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
37
Best Rank
143
1
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$514.2K
Career Money
$43.6K
Left-handed (two-handed backhand)
Plays
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Ryoko Fuda
JPN
w
l
w
l
w
w
l
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
43
Age
39
1.78m
Height
1.65m
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
37
Best Rank
143
1
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$514.2K
Career Money
$43.6K
Left-handed (two-handed backhand)
Plays
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)
Head-to-head: Czink 1 - 0 Fuda
They have played 2 sets in total, with Melinda Czink winning 2 and Ryoko Fuda winning 0. The last match between Melinda Czink and Ryoko Fuda was at the Japan Women's Open Tennis - Osaka, 12-10-2009, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Melinda Czink getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Czink | 1 |
| Fuda | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Japan Women's Open Tennis - Osaka(10-12-09)
Melinda Czink
6
6
Ryoko Fuda
4
4
M. Czink vs R. Fuda H2H Profile
M. Czink vs R. Fuda Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Melinda Czink has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Ryoko Fuda has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Melinda Czink, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ryoko Fuda has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Melinda Czink has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ryoko Fuda has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Melinda Czink has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Ryoko Fuda winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Melinda Czink has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 149/110), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 53% (W/L 32/28). Ryoko Fuda has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 147/108), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/3).
- Player level: In the last year, Melinda Czink has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Ryoko Fuda has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Melinda Czink winning 1 times and Ryoko Fuda being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Melinda Czink winning 2 and Ryoko Fuda winning 0.
- The last match between Melinda Czink and Ryoko Fuda was at the Japan Women's Open Tennis - Osaka, 12-10-2009, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Melinda Czink getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Melinda Czink has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Ryoko Fuda has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Melinda Czink has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ryoko Fuda has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Melinda Czink has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ryoko Fuda has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Melinda Czink vs Ryoko Fuda Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Czink vs R. Fuda H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 8 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 51% (30/59) | 1st Serve % | 73% (47/64) |
| 80% (24/30) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (29/47) |
| 66% (19/29) | 2nd Serve Win % | 59% (10/17) |
| 38% (3/8) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (1/2) |
| 39% (25/64) | Return Points Win % | 27% (16/59) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Czink 0%, Fuda 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Czink 0%, Fuda 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Czink 0%, Fuda 0%.
M. Czink Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 4-6 6-3 6-1 | ||
R2 | L | 6-4 4-2 ret. | ||
Q2 | W | 6-3 7-6(5) | ||
R1 | W | 6-0 6-1 | ||
R. Fuda Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 2-6 6-4 6-0 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-1 7-5 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Q2 | W | 0-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | ||

M. Czink vs R. Fuda Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.14% (370/301) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.33% (178/138) |
| 53.77% (842/724) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.45% (407/327) |
| 51.69% (7483/6995) | Games Win/Loss | 52.99% (3495/3101) |
| 53.77% (164/141) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.65% (147/108) |
| 57.53% (149/110) | Clay Win/Loss | 33.33% (2/4) |
| 53.19% (25/22) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55.77% (29/23) |
| 53.33% (32/28) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 622 | Aces Total | 22 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.04 |
| 1202 | Total Double Faults | 142 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 546.29 | Average Opponent Rank | 33.16 |
| 63% (11188/17857) | 1st Serve % | 65% (2140/3288) |
| 64% (7139/11188) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (1274/2140) |
| 46% (3029/6622) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (514/1148) |
| 44% (839/1923) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (180/416) |
| 42% (7411/17630) | Return Points Win % | 45% (1452/3245) |
| 42.65% (29/39) | Slam W/L | 41.18% (7/10) |
| 44.83% (26/32) | Masters W/L | 41.67% (5/7) |
| 50.57% (132/129) | Main Tour W/L | 48.75% (39/41) |
| 64.52% (180/99) | Challenger W/L | 60.80% (121/78) |
| 60.00% (3/2) | Futures W/L | 75.00% (6/2) |
| 56% (366/657) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (175/309) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 50% (81/162) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (26/55) |
| 56% (133/237) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (52/103) |
| 84% (350/294) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (177/148) |
| 16% (350/56) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (177/29) |
| 24% (321/77) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (139/30) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
12:30 PM 20/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 20/11/25
Prediction03:15 AM 20/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 20/11/25
Prediction07:05 PM 19/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 20/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

19 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Flavio Cobolli vs Filip Misolic Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ITA – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

19 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Matteo Berrettini vs Jurij Rodionov Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ITA – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

19 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kathinka Von Deichmann vs Elena Gabriela Ruse Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

18 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Eva Vedder vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

18 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Shintaro Mochizuki vs Federico Arnaboldi Prediction – ATP Bergamo Challenger – 18th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
20:15
H2H 1-0
20:05
H2H 1-0
19:20
H2H 0-0
21:00
H2H 0-0
21:05
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ITA-AUT
Italy
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Santiago
Chile
M15 Tallahassee
United States
M25 Austin
United States
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia